<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Update: What candidates&#8217; language saying about them</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.foghound.com/249/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.foghound.com/249/</link>
	<description>News and views about marketing and communications</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 21:30:23 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tom Asacker</title>
		<link>http://blog.foghound.com/249/#comment-2738</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Asacker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 11:55:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.foghound.com/249/#comment-2738</guid>
		<description>"The language analysis science is fascinating. The question, however, is whether voters will detect the same conclusions as the software and how it will influence their decisions."

Great conclusion Lois!  And to me, the heart of the marketing question.  A lot of today's tools, techniques, concepts, and platforms are fascinating.  But . . . do they truly influence customer choice?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The language analysis science is fascinating. The question, however, is whether voters will detect the same conclusions as the software and how it will influence their decisions.&#8221;</p>
<p>Great conclusion Lois!  And to me, the heart of the marketing question.  A lot of today&#8217;s tools, techniques, concepts, and platforms are fascinating.  But . . . do they truly influence customer choice?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
