CA: Good intentions but muddled marketing

November 15th, 2005 Lois Kelly Posted in Advertising, Dumb company stories 1 Comment »

Computer Associates, now to be
called CA, today featured multi-page spreads in newspapers like “The
New York Times” announcing the company’s new growth strategy.

But darned if I can figure out what they’re talking about, which is too bad because CEO John Swainson seems
so passionate about cleaning up CA and making the company matter again
to its corporate customers. I’m rooting for him to succeed, but there
are a few things in marketing that he’s going to have to change to win
me over – and his customers. (Newsday
interviewed some of CA’s customers following John’s speech in Las
Vegas, and they too are a little befuddled.)Here’s what CA needs to do
differently:

Readjust your assumptions and tap into what’s really going on with your customers

The ad headlines are “Remember when technology had the power to inspire
you? Believe again.” Technology has been extremely inspiring in so many
ways to so many of us. We never lost the belief. CA may have lost its
inspiration along the way, which accounts for so little company
innovation and growth. We don’t need to be told in ads to “believe
again” in technology. What we do need, however, is to be told why we
should believe again in CA and its technology and services.

Explain what you mean:

Which brings me to point two. What the heck is your big new vision,
Enterprise IT Management (EITM)? Your communications talk about how it
“unifies and simplifies complex IT environments across the enterprise.”
The press release headline says, “Unified Management of End-to-End
Infrastructure Enables IT Organizationsto Overcome Complexity and
Ensure Performance Of Business Services.” But hello, what exactly is
it? I really know technology, yet I can’t figure out what the big aha
is here. More context, examples, maybe some helpful metaphors, and just
plain speak would really help.

Rid yourself of the trite lines and tired talk

I’ve heard John talk and he’s engaging and direct. So why is your
letter, advertising and Web site so full of empty corporate speak,
which, by the by, uses phrases that date back to what other tech
companies used in the 90s? Phrases like “transforming business,”
“unifying and simplifying complex IT environments,” “reach a higher
order of IT,” “simplify the complex,” “deliver fully against your
business goals,” “align IT to reach business goals,” are empty, boring,
and tired.

Talk about something fresh, in your own words – not a copywriter’s:

CA must have some points-of-view on enterprise technology that are
contrarian, counter-intuitive, unusual, insightful, or surprising. How
else can you innovate, as you say you have, if you weren’t turned on by
some big insights? What customer insight triggered the passion of your
developers? What do you know that you can do better than any of your
competitors? Talk about those ideas. In the real words of real people.
In today’s business world, a new logo and name change don’t matter all
that much. People want a reason to believe in you. They want fresh
ideas. And they want to connect with the company and its people — not
with a new acronym.

I love the technology industry and hope that
there is great thinking and innovation going on at CA. Maybe the
marketing approach just needs to revamped.

When many of us see
this old style marketing, with to much hoo-ha around logos and category
acronyms and not enough clear explanations of what is new and valuable,
we often think that there is no new strategy. Just a great shade of new
lipstick that is likely to quickly fade.

Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • E-mail this story to a friend!
  • Print this article!
  • TwitThis
  • Reddit
  • bodytext
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon
  • NewsVine
  • Live
AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Travelocity’s marketing needs to connect the dots

November 12th, 2004 Lois Kelly Posted in Advertising, Dumb company stories No Comments »

Who knew that Travelocity is
much better than competitors like Expedia and Hotels.com? Not me. All
the big online travel sites’ marketing sound alike to me.

A couple of weeks ago I sat in on an excellent presentation by Jeffrey Gulleck,
CMO of Travelocity, at the Sales and Marketing Leaders Summit in Desert
Springs, CA. Gulleck explained that most of the online travel sites
confirm our hotel reservations with, hold on now, faxes back and forth
to the hotels. Travelocity’s technology is far more advanced, which
helps the service provide better deals, better service, more
reliability. “The complexity of the travel industry is our friend,”
explained Gulleck. “It provides a barrier to small companies entering
the category, and helps us compete against the other major players.”

Most
interesting was the strategic work Gulleck has done to create a new
positioning: “Travelocity is the advocate for travelers,” a position
that Travelocity can deliver on better than any of their competitors.
Most disappointing, however, was seeing Travelocity’s new gnome ads,
which don’t pay off the positioning.Why,
we wonder, don’t companies use their positioning points-of-view to
drive all of their brand communications, from advertising and public
relations to sales presentations and Web marketing? If Travelocity
really wants to be an advocate for travelers, it might think about
trading in the gnomes for a Gert Boyle-like campaign. (I’d trust
Columbia Sportswear’s “Mother Boyle” ads before the gnome.) Or allocate
more to a content-driven advertorial campaign. Or get more from PR.

With my work schedule, I really want a travel advocate. Travelocity needs to prove that it is one.

Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • E-mail this story to a friend!
  • Print this article!
  • TwitThis
  • Reddit
  • bodytext
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon
  • NewsVine
  • Live
AddThis Social Bookmark Button