Understanding segmentation as it relates to online communities can help us gain insights from our most loyal users and influencers; prioritize community features, content and functionality; and possibly create ways to help customers become more loyal.
Back in 1999 Professor Rob Kozinets published a much-cited academic paper, “E-Tribalized Marketing?” The Strategic Implications of Virtual Communities of Consumption,” that provides some insights that are highly relevant today.

Community involvement: two factors
Two non-independent factor influence how involved a person will become with a community, says Rob in the article.
1. The more central the consumption activity is to the person’s psychological self-concept, the more likely the person will pursue and value membership in the community.
2. The intensity of the social relationships the person has in the community.
Segmenting four types of community members
Community members can then be segmented into four types; two of which matter most to marketers, believes Rob.
1. Tourists: lack strong social ties, maintain only a superficial or passing interest in the consumption activity.
2. Minglers: have strong social ties, but aren’t all that interested in the consumption activity.
3. Devotees: maintain strong interest for consumption activity, but have few social attachments to the group .
4. Insiders: have strong social ties and strong personal ties to consumption activity.
Implications to marketers
Insights: Primary research shows that heavy users and loyal customers are represented in communities by the insiders and devotees. Invaluable business insights from these influencers can be gained from observing community.
Brand relationship development: Tourists and minglers can sometimes be “upgraded” to insiders and devotees as they become involved in the community. The community itself may propagate the development of loyalty and heavy usage, says Rob, by culturally and socially reinforcing consumption. To do this it’s important that the visitor find value and spend time in the community to see ways the consumption activity may be more relevant than she or he had realized.
Different content, activities: Different community member segments want to get different things from the community, which helps guide the community management strategy. In Rob’s view tourists and devotees want to get factual information from the community, while minglers and insiders tend to be much more social and relational, answering people’s questions, adding content. Since insiders are the most loyal customers, it’s important that the community appeal to what they want in information and how they want to socialize in the community.
Do you need a community? This point is mine, not Rob’s. If the business consumption activity is not central to your customers’ “psychological self concept,” do you need a community? To what percentage of your customers is the consumption activity central — and is that percentage large enough to justify the investment required in managing a community? I’ve been collecting communities that are largely abandoned, despite being beautifully designed with great functionality. The reason? People just aren’t into the issue/topic/business category all that much — it’s not central to who they are or what they need to be successful in their job. Sometimes all that’s needed is a souped-up Web site where people can get and share more kinds of information more easily.
Share and Enjoy:
These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.